Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 58508 for speedy trial.

[PDF] James P. Brennan v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
, formerly known as Midwestern National Insurance Corporation, appeals from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13351 - 2017-09-21

Cory A. Emmerich v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
that the evidence does not support the jury’s finding on causation. He also argues that the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11896 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in its determination of custody and placement of his minor children, and when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34565 - 2008-11-11

[PDF] Thomas Willan v. Columbia County
that No. 00-0592 2 Columbia County had complied with the trial court’s writ of mandamus.1 Willan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Walter L. Merten v. Robin McGruder
. The McGruders argue that the trial court erred in ruling that Merten was entitled to damages for lost rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10014 - 2017-09-19

State v. Erik W. Parlow
evidence to sustain the conviction. We cannot agree and affirm the trial court’s judgment. On August 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14387 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eugene Nichols
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bryon Buhse
a trial court order that denied his § 974.06, STATS., postconviction motion challenging his 1990 felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11356 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
violated when the State failed to disclose certain evidence to him prior to trial. For the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21

Paul H. Raasoch v. Sandra Sue Raasoch
reconsideration of the judgment. Paul contends that the trial court’s division of the marital estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6766 - 2005-03-31