Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13521 - 13530 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] WI App 37
N.W.2d 665. We review both summary and declaratory judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59521 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶16 An evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27936 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP1877-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2004CF2137
considered all issues de novo and ruled against the party). For these reasons, the trial court’s error
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34640 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dale Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
the facts of a particular case fulfill a legal standard is a question of law we review de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16905 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Clarice Baldwin as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry Baldwin v.
is de novo. Groom v. Professionals Ins. Co., 179 Wis. 2d 241, 246, 507 N.W.2d 121 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5221 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tele-Port, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.
, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3083 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5557 - 2017-09-19

Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
decision and instead obtain a de novo hearing before an arbitrator on the just cause issue, the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14760 - 2013-11-25

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
judgment. Sass appeals. ¶4 Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35601 - 2009-10-25

2010 WI APP 149
to review the Commission’s decision de novo, instead applying the great weight deference standard after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55738 - 2010-11-16