Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13521 - 13530 of 73792 for we.
Search results 13521 - 13530 of 73792 for we.
Milwaukee Police Association v. Nannette H. Hegerty
court, which had ruled in favor of the petitioners.[1] In this case we must determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16821 - 2005-03-31
court, which had ruled in favor of the petitioners.[1] In this case we must determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
3303-05 Marina Road v. Zennett Properties
claims against Bennett or Zennett Properties. ¶3 We consolidate the appeals for dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26509 - 2017-09-21
claims against Bennett or Zennett Properties. ¶3 We consolidate the appeals for dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26509 - 2017-09-21
State v. Margaret H.
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Shannon R.
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
2006 WI APP 231
on improper and inaccurate information when imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26678 - 2006-11-20
on improper and inaccurate information when imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26678 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
WI APP 231
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
State v. James D. Ryan
to dismiss the refusal order after he pleaded guilty to the OWI charge. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7661 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss the refusal order after he pleaded guilty to the OWI charge. We conclude the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7661 - 2005-03-31
Edwin C. West v. Phil Macht
in the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions and Wis. Stat. § 51.61(1)(u) (1997-98).[1] We agree with West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15699 - 2005-03-31
in the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions and Wis. Stat. § 51.61(1)(u) (1997-98).[1] We agree with West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15699 - 2005-03-31
Richard G. Scullion and Teresa Scullion v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company
, Teresa Scullion, cross-appeal the jury’s finding that they were contributorily negligent. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14768 - 2005-03-31
, Teresa Scullion, cross-appeal the jury’s finding that they were contributorily negligent. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14768 - 2005-03-31