Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 29011 for f.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 29011 for f.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See RULE 809.32(1)(f). We reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143006 - 2017-09-21
. See RULE 809.32(1)(f). We reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143006 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
)(f) (GAL report due thirty days after court appointment). However, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119203 - 2026-05-20
)(f) (GAL report due thirty days after court appointment). However, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119203 - 2026-05-20
State v. Joyce A.R.
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Manitowoc County: Eugene F. mc essey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15364 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Manitowoc County: Eugene F. mc essey, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15364 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to the enhanced penalty “[i]f the prior convictions are admitted by the defendant or proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30034 - 2007-08-20
is subject to the enhanced penalty “[i]f the prior convictions are admitted by the defendant or proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30034 - 2007-08-20
State v. Helen J. Lecker
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16327 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16327 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
”); see also United States v. Harnage, 662 F. Supp. 766, 776 (D. Colo. 1987) (defendant had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57522 - 2010-12-06
”); see also United States v. Harnage, 662 F. Supp. 766, 776 (D. Colo. 1987) (defendant had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57522 - 2010-12-06
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
10-14-2009 Affirmed 2009AP000252 FT Jami L. Carroll v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44699 - 2009-12-14
10-14-2009 Affirmed 2009AP000252 FT Jami L. Carroll v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44699 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Lee
States v. Scarpa, 913 F.2d 993, 1016–1017 (2d Cir. 1990). Here, the trial court could properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4506 - 2017-09-19
States v. Scarpa, 913 F.2d 993, 1016–1017 (2d Cir. 1990). Here, the trial court could properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31751 - 2014-09-15
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Wilde
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4830 - 2017-09-19
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4830 - 2017-09-19