Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 58500 for o j.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 58500 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that she was “[o]nly a point zero six” and, even more vaguely, during the September 3 call when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194466 - 2017-09-21
that she was “[o]nly a point zero six” and, even more vaguely, during the September 3 call when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]o establish prejudice in the context of a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255522 - 2020-03-03
that “[t]o establish prejudice in the context of a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255522 - 2020-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
304, 317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987) (“[O]ur first task is to determine whether plaintiffs have stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132647 - 2015-01-07
304, 317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987) (“[O]ur first task is to determine whether plaintiffs have stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132647 - 2015-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to stipulate. It did so because Nathan had hedged when he stated he was agreeing to the commitment order “[o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
to stipulate. It did so because Nathan had hedged when he stated he was agreeing to the commitment order “[o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
: michael o. bohren, Judge. Reversed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
: michael o. bohren, Judge. Reversed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that, under these circumstances, “[t]o strictly apply the prenuptial agreement as requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347404 - 2021-03-18
concluded that, under these circumstances, “[t]o strictly apply the prenuptial agreement as requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347404 - 2021-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 3, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
further noted that the exhaustion doctrine has “numerous exceptions,” and that “[o]ur court has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56142 - 2010-11-02
further noted that the exhaustion doctrine has “numerous exceptions,” and that “[o]ur court has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56142 - 2010-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 92, 96, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984) (“[n]o witness, expert or otherwise, should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133343 - 2006-03-08
Wis. 2d 92, 96, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984) (“[n]o witness, expert or otherwise, should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133343 - 2006-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his contention that the jury convicted him “o[f] the robbery charge based solely on the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-30
his contention that the jury convicted him “o[f] the robbery charge based solely on the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Dr. Glassman opined that “[t]o the extent that Mr. Pico’s self report of his behavior … amounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542422 - 2022-07-13
.” Dr. Glassman opined that “[t]o the extent that Mr. Pico’s self report of his behavior … amounted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542422 - 2022-07-13