Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 64013 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because issues of arguable merit are presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because issues of arguable merit are presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has read and understood the plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has read and understood the plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
been clear that when this court does not have a copy of the transcript, the record is incomplete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31725 - 2008-02-05
been clear that when this court does not have a copy of the transcript, the record is incomplete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31725 - 2008-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2016AP1984-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204677 - 2017-12-06
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2016AP1984-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204677 - 2017-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s remarks are ambiguous then we must look to the entire record to determine the court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
the court’s remarks are ambiguous then we must look to the entire record to determine the court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
County of Milwaukee v. Ellen T. Roy
, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record, stating: “[The County] told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record, stating: “[The County] told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Katherine Sarazin v. Tom Hudson
only contact with her was one phone call, informing her by recorded message that he had her paycheck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10919 - 2017-09-20
only contact with her was one phone call, informing her by recorded message that he had her paycheck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10919 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016930 - 2025-09-30
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016930 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160130 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160130 - 2017-09-21