Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13541 - 13550 of 20373 for sai.

COURT OF APPEALS
this contention suggests that Brown’s trial counsel did not know what Love might say if called to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48912 - 2010-04-12

CA Blank Order
about competency, noting that Madison “hasn’t been making much sense in what he has been saying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97919 - 2013-06-04

[PDF] WI APP 88
to sentencing.”). No. 2012AP1808-CR 9 found no case that holds that the State is obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
with the adjudication and it was the court’s schedule that prevented them from doing so. Given this, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28296 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that makes him pay sanctions. The notice of appeal in the contempt case, signed by Raneda, however, says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58528 - 2011-01-03

COURT OF APPEALS
and stated he needed to talk to her. Hertel did not say she did not want him in the house, did not tell him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24

CA Blank Order
was not forcing a plea. The circuit court then noted that, even if what McCastle was saying was true, “[t]here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108098 - 2014-02-11

State v. Everton Taylor
, the female who answered the door refused delivery, saying that nobody by that name lived there. As he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth M. Davis
saying so at Davis’s request. Hence, even if Griffin’s testimony were offered to support Decorah’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6344 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter J. McMaster
to say that the goal is purely a punitive one or even that it is largely punitive. The simple truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8975 - 2005-03-31