Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13551 - 13560 of 54447 for linda s blake obituary 1984.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with B.H.’s request. ¶10 Dunn subsequently filed a postconviction motion in March 2019, raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371924 - 2021-06-02

[PDF] State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). In order to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12954 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. Johnson
) … if a person is convicted of a crime, the court, by order, may withhold sentence or impose sentence under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19295 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lynn Boxhorn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
of any vehicle other than a public passenger vehicle, then it was (pedestrian)'s duty to yield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7873 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Dane v. Daniel P. O'Connell
contends that “the owners in this case took no step[s] ‘such as fencing, to keep the public off
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5869 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eddie L. Quinn
, except as provided in s. 939.24 (3). 4 Persons not accepted for these reasons are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James A. Genett
, Genett must satisfy the two-pronged test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove prejudice, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36376 - 2009-05-04

COURT OF APPEALS
) the officer had “specific knowledge” about the person s/he should have known was reasonably likely to elicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17

[PDF] State v. Joseph K. Bryant
, 429 (1984). The Miranda Court reasoned that the interaction of custody and No. 00-0686-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19