Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13571 - 13580 of 98499 for court records search online.

State v. Scott A. Long
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE January 21, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12840 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Long
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE January 21, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12840 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rita A. Whitish
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED October 26, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9087 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 4, 2010 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56315 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would have been overruled. [The circuit court] explicitly found that the employment records met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104817 - 2026-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
income. The record does not support Allan’s assertion that the trial court attributed to him his 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236496 - 2019-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it. ¶11 The circuit court also listened to a recording provided by Adam of phone calls between Adam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868101 - 2024-10-30

State v. Peter G. Tkacz
. Instead, the court instructed Tkacz’s counsel to conduct a search of Brown’s record himself. Not only did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter G. Tkacz
court did none of the above. Instead, the court instructed Tkacz’s counsel to conduct a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court here did not take additional evidence, and therefore the record under review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956363 - 2025-06-25