Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13571 - 13580 of 50108 for our.
Search results 13571 - 13580 of 50108 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204965 - 2017-12-08
of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204965 - 2017-12-08
State v. John R. Martin
. Kachinsky concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2005-03-31
. Kachinsky concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not found. would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91298 - 2014-09-15
not found. would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607849 - 2023-01-06
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607849 - 2023-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385–386, 585 N.W.2d 640, 646 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the agency’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102207 - 2013-09-23
, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385–386, 585 N.W.2d 640, 646 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the agency’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102207 - 2013-09-23
CA Blank Order
than the sentence imposed for co-defendants. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128335 - 2014-11-17
than the sentence imposed for co-defendants. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128335 - 2014-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the sentence imposed on his 2001 conviction for repeated sexual assault of a child.1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676540 - 2023-07-06
on the sentence imposed on his 2001 conviction for repeated sexual assault of a child.1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676540 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231976 - 2019-01-08
and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231976 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to Carter’s sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425953 - 2021-09-21
to a challenge to Carter’s sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425953 - 2021-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was properly exercised, see id., 217 Wis. 2d at 418–419, 576 N.W.2d at 925, and we do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14
was properly exercised, see id., 217 Wis. 2d at 418–419, 576 N.W.2d at 925, and we do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59990 - 2011-02-14