Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13581 - 13590 of 68502 for did.
Search results 13581 - 13590 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that he did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his “refusal was due to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73486 - 2011-11-07
determination that he did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his “refusal was due to a physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73486 - 2011-11-07
State v. Michael Johnson
planned on doing that night, Mike? A I had planned on getting high, myself. Q In fact, did not you have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2353 - 2005-03-31
planned on doing that night, Mike? A I had planned on getting high, myself. Q In fact, did not you have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing that the disciplinary hearing officer did not follow the correct procedure for using CI statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
, arguing that the disciplinary hearing officer did not follow the correct procedure for using CI statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
Frontsheet
to represent S.H. for a one-third contingency fee. Attorney Wood did not provide S.H. with a written fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124799 - 2014-10-20
to represent S.H. for a one-third contingency fee. Attorney Wood did not provide S.H. with a written fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124799 - 2014-10-20
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Neil P. Jackson
kick the door, and three or four gunshots. Dejesus told the jury that she did not recognize the man
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7558 - 2017-09-19
kick the door, and three or four gunshots. Dejesus told the jury that she did not recognize the man
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Godlewski $5000 in damages as compensation for Society’s role in the loss of their dog. Society did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53541 - 2014-09-15
Godlewski $5000 in damages as compensation for Society’s role in the loss of their dog. Society did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53541 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing, the prosecutor explained that after Hicks decided that he did not want to resolve the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109537 - 2017-09-21
hearing, the prosecutor explained that after Hicks decided that he did not want to resolve the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109537 - 2017-09-21