Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
the statutory elements of a crime presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Ruesch, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6621 - 2017-09-19
the statutory elements of a crime presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Ruesch, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6621 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 40
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our standard of review is de novo, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683128 - 2023-09-21
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our standard of review is de novo, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683128 - 2023-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against the defendant was direct or circumstantial. Id. at 501. We review de novo whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615340 - 2023-01-26
against the defendant was direct or circumstantial. Id. at 501. We review de novo whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615340 - 2023-01-26
[PDF]
WI APP 98
, we agree, on our de novo review of the circuit court’s legal analysis, that the Radford rule also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51455 - 2014-09-15
, we agree, on our de novo review of the circuit court’s legal analysis, that the Radford rule also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Peralta, 2011 WI App 81, ¶16, 334 Wis. 2d 159, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753461 - 2024-01-23
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Peralta, 2011 WI App 81, ¶16, 334 Wis. 2d 159, 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753461 - 2024-01-23
State v. Robert M. Madsen
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. ¶15 Madsen argues he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. ¶15 Madsen argues he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
Marcia K. Johnson v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13513 - 2005-03-31
for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶29 Generally, we review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Pietrowski v. Dufrane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
¶29 Generally, we review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Pietrowski v. Dufrane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
becomes a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶34. ¶12 As the State notes, proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
becomes a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶34. ¶12 As the State notes, proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
State v. George Melvin Taylor
to employ a de novo standard of review in assessing the trial court’s determination on the Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6560 - 2017-09-19
to employ a de novo standard of review in assessing the trial court’s determination on the Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6560 - 2017-09-19