Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 30150 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Mikulewicz under WIS. STAT. § 854.20 because the circumstances of this case show that a “de-facto adoption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460450 - 2021-12-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
charged is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id., ¶14. Here, for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94617 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frank M. Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B., 159 Wis.2d 662, 666
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13382 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] ¶2015 WI APP 66
we address de novo. State v. Adams, 152 Wis. 2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145361 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeal. DISCUSSION ¶9 We review de novo a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673635 - 2023-06-29

[PDF] Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B., 159 Wis.2d 662, 666
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13386 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Rochelt, 165 Wis. 2d 373, 379, 477 N.W.2d 659 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498468 - 2022-03-22

[PDF] Michael J. Henry v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
review a trial court’s partial summary judgment de novo, but we nonetheless value a trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14417 - 2014-09-15