Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 68502 for did.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Loren C. Alliet
order since it is a 1999 case.” The case was then adjourned for sentencing. ¶5 Alliet did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7179 - 2017-09-20
order since it is a 1999 case.” The case was then adjourned for sentencing. ¶5 Alliet did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7179 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Amy M. Kordus v. Katherine A. Parks
, but the trial court found to the contrary. Next, Attorney Carroll argued that the file did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16154 - 2017-09-21
, but the trial court found to the contrary. Next, Attorney Carroll argued that the file did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the prosecutor’s single improper comment did not rise to the level of plain error. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611107 - 2023-01-18
that the prosecutor’s single improper comment did not rise to the level of plain error. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611107 - 2023-01-18
Eric M. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
with Schmitz’s forged signature. Both checks were deposited in a Georgetown account and Schmitz did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4279 - 2005-03-31
with Schmitz’s forged signature. Both checks were deposited in a Georgetown account and Schmitz did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4279 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Yanske
did not observe any bright light emitting from Yanske’s car nor did he observe the presence of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21053 - 2006-01-25
did not observe any bright light emitting from Yanske’s car nor did he observe the presence of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21053 - 2006-01-25
State v. Matthew R.L.
electronic items from a car and a trailer. Matthew did not take or keep any of the stolen items himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
electronic items from a car and a trailer. Matthew did not take or keep any of the stolen items himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI App 59
. The circuit court reversed on two grounds. First, it held that the Board did not demonstrate a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32059 - 2008-04-29
. The circuit court reversed on two grounds. First, it held that the Board did not demonstrate a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32059 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
WI App 59
did not demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion because it No. 2007AP1072 2 failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32059 - 2014-09-15
did not demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion because it No. 2007AP1072 2 failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32059 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
because Applings did not file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief in that matter.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08
because Applings did not file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief in that matter.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08