Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13591 - 13600 of 20379 for sai.

State v. Brian A. Patterson
might have inferred that the trial court had somehow modified its ruling without saying so. After all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ashley S.
that because I meant to say that I did see some of her private parts. Ashley provides no authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15464 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
with their reading of that case. What Baumeister says is that we will not impose costs and attorney fees “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he elected to take the route that he now says disadvantaged him. See State v. Gove, 148 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197436 - 2017-10-05

State v. Peter J. McMaster
to say that the goal is purely a punitive one or even that it is largely punitive. The simple truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8975 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew T. Doughty
had to say to the officers … of his own free will.” We agree. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kycha L.
of a parent in a TPR case. While an accurate citation, the case goes on to say that “whether a respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14194 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Lee Doll
fashion, the primary factors were considered. ¶25 Further, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16326 - 2005-03-31

Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
in Stoll v. Adriansen, 122 Wis. 2d 503, 514-15 n.5, 362 N.W.2d 182 (Ct. App. 1984), as saying, “Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard D. Martin
, suffice it to say that Martin advances a plausible argument that he was not free to leave until he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19