Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 2158 for Victor Garcia.

[PDF] State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
. No. 2005AP3165 6 review de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motors of Am. Inc., 2004 WI 93,¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 612
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25276 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
claim of innocence. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 (1970); accord State v. Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06

[PDF] State v. Daniel H. Frasch
is on the defendant to prove a fair and just reason by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8864 - 2017-09-19

State v. Darrin L. Britt
State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 856-857, 532 N.W.2d 111, 115 (1995). Therefore, an appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 805.17(2), but we independently interpret a statute and apply it to the facts. Garcia v. Mazda Motor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338907 - 2021-02-25

State Bank of Cross Plains v. Douglas J. Garavalia
a question of law, which we review de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motors of Am. Inc., 2004 WI 93,¶7, 273 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25276 - 2006-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
we review independently. Garcia v. Mazda Motor, 2004 WI 93, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 612, 682 N.W.2d 365. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14

COURT OF APPEALS
reason for withdrawal. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 862, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). Fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132115 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] NOTICE
. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App. 1995). We agree with the State that the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28648 - 2014-09-15

Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
. In Garcia v. United States, 680 F.2d 29 (5th Cir. 1982), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12007 - 2005-03-31