Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 29957 for de.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 29957 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a defendant made a sufficient showing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243860 - 2019-07-24
. Whether a defendant made a sufficient showing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243860 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
barred by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21
barred by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21
State v. Byron A. Anderson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶5 An arrest occurs when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶5 An arrest occurs when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allan D. Schopper
who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
and the interpretation of [§ 632.32(4), STATS.] … present questions of law” subject to de novo review. Hull, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21
and the interpretation of [§ 632.32(4), STATS.] … present questions of law” subject to de novo review. Hull, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
primary physical placement and sole legal custody for educational decisions. Following a de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192383 - 2017-09-21
primary physical placement and sole legal custody for educational decisions. Following a de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192383 - 2017-09-21