Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Riddle
principles to those facts is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4967 - 2017-09-19
principles to those facts is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4967 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alexander Stocks
observed Stocks take a bottle of “The Gap Eau De Toilette” from a shelf, place it in a black plastic bag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
observed Stocks take a bottle of “The Gap Eau De Toilette” from a shelf, place it in a black plastic bag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
of his injury. No. 01-2473 4 ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
of his injury. No. 01-2473 4 ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
State v. Luis A. Martinez
, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion on whether a search comports with the “reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5273 - 2005-03-31
, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion on whether a search comports with the “reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5273 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts and that is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
to undisputed facts and that is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21
State v. Allan D. Schopper
the court commissioner who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11672 - 2005-03-31
the court commissioner who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott M. Doering
investigative stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
investigative stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28