Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 2642 for hill's.

State v. Christopher S.
, that he be placed at Lincoln Hills. Christopher argues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9506 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 312 (citing Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1984)). ¶11 As discussed above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21

State v. Eddie L. Thomas
effective assistance of counsel requires the application of a two-part test. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Stanley Hess
to whether the affirmative defense likely would have succeeded at trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20

State v. Frankie G.
upon his release from Lincoln Hills, and these efforts have failed. Frankie G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9350 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
not established the prejudice prong set out in Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). When challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27997 - 2007-02-05

State v. Vincent Angiolo
(quoting Judiciary Committee's 1953 Report on the Criminal Code, cmt., at 191). See also People v. Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10228 - 2005-03-31

Iron County v. John J. Kirby
pronouncement, controls. See Hill v. LIRC, 184 Wis. 2d 101, 516 N.W.2d 441 (Ct. App. 1994).[7] ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6151 - 2005-03-31

Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
is immune under § 893.80(4), Stats.,[3] is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kimps v. Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14564 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Vincent Angiolo
(quoting Judiciary Committee's 1953 Report on the Criminal Code, cmt., at 191). See also People v. Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10228 - 2017-09-20