Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 41595 for she's.
Search results 1361 - 1370 of 41595 for she's.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. She faced maximum penalties of a $25,000 fine and twelve years and six months of imprisonment. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295886 - 2020-10-20
. She faced maximum penalties of a $25,000 fine and twelve years and six months of imprisonment. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295886 - 2020-10-20
State v. Rick A. Holtz
had sexual intercourse with her. ¶3 At trial Amanda testified that she first met Holtz when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17829 - 2014-02-03
had sexual intercourse with her. ¶3 At trial Amanda testified that she first met Holtz when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17829 - 2014-02-03
Yolanda Springfield-Woodard v.
in her client trust account and produce those records at the Board's request, certifying that she had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17103 - 2005-03-31
in her client trust account and produce those records at the Board's request, certifying that she had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated was unlawful. She argues that: (1) the refusal proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated was unlawful. She argues that: (1) the refusal proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to liability because she had “negligently” “los[t] control of her vehicle and of its whereabouts” before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213224 - 2018-05-22
to liability because she had “negligently” “los[t] control of her vehicle and of its whereabouts” before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213224 - 2018-05-22
State v. Diane M. Somers
intoxicated was unlawful. She argues that: (1) the refusal proceedings were instituted by the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated was unlawful. She argues that: (1) the refusal proceedings were instituted by the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Suzann L. Turner
of felony battery to a child.1 She argues that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15020 - 2017-09-21
of felony battery to a child.1 She argues that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15020 - 2017-09-21
State v. Suzann L. Turner
appeals a judgment convicting her of felony battery to a child.[1] She argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15020 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment convicting her of felony battery to a child.[1] She argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15020 - 2005-03-31
WI App 93 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2101-CR Complete Title...
was a minor at the time the statements were made, she was incapable of consenting to their interception under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120117 - 2014-09-23
was a minor at the time the statements were made, she was incapable of consenting to their interception under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120117 - 2014-09-23
2009 WI APP 120
. was nineteen years old when she testified to the following at Quiroz’s trial. In April 2002, at age fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36917 - 2009-08-25
. was nineteen years old when she testified to the following at Quiroz’s trial. In April 2002, at age fifteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36917 - 2009-08-25