Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13601 - 13610 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13601 - 13610 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to an evidentiary chemical test of his blood under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
a determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to an evidentiary chemical test of his blood under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192830 - 2017-09-21
State v. David G. Huusko
their failure to introduce the negative results of a drug test taken May 8, 2000, by Huusko’s federal probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
their failure to introduce the negative results of a drug test taken May 8, 2000, by Huusko’s federal probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
State v. Juan B. Garcia
license. The court also granted Garcia’s request for an independent laboratory test of the blood sample he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
license. The court also granted Garcia’s request for an independent laboratory test of the blood sample he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6313 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Fries
Fries to perform the alphabet test, and on the first try, Fries got to the midpoint of the alphabet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
Fries to perform the alphabet test, and on the first try, Fries got to the midpoint of the alphabet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David G. Huusko
to explain their failure to introduce the negative results of a drug test taken May 8, 2000, by Huusko’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26441 - 2017-09-21
to explain their failure to introduce the negative results of a drug test taken May 8, 2000, by Huusko’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests (FSTs). The deputy observed no indicators of impairment on the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
tests (FSTs). The deputy observed no indicators of impairment on the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and refusing to take a test for intoxication as required by WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184280 - 2017-09-21
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) and refusing to take a test for intoxication as required by WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184280 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of both possession and burglary. He concedes that under the “elements-only” test of Blockburger v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
of both possession and burglary. He concedes that under the “elements-only” test of Blockburger v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
State v. Glen A. Lewis
to submit to a field sobriety test was reasonable. Because there was probable cause for arrest and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4824 - 2005-03-31
to submit to a field sobriety test was reasonable. Because there was probable cause for arrest and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
concedes that under the “elements- only” test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15
concedes that under the “elements- only” test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49414 - 2014-09-15