Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13601 - 13610 of 18714 for quote.

State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
. City of Eau Claire, 176 Wis.2d 391, 396-97, 501 N.W.2d 49, 51 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Conroy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
venireperson].’” Id., ¶29 (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 97; bracketing in Lamon). “Unless discriminatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10

[PDF] State v. Levi J.D.
to present relevant evidence not substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect. Id. (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12065 - 2017-09-21

State v. James C. Sarlund
. Jerrico, Inc., 446 U.S. 238, 250 (1980) (quoted source omitted; citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9190 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy L. Demmer
issues. For example, Demmer begins his argument by quoting from Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21511 - 2006-02-22

2010 WI APP 93
of arrest might be found in the vehicle.’” Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 1719 (2009) (quoting Thornton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51491 - 2011-01-27

Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
N.W.2d 378, 381 (Ct. App. 1988), quoted the following language from Welch v. State Farm Mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
no reasonable purpose or relationship to the facts or a proper state policy.’” Id. (quoting Milwaukee Brewers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4464 - 2005-03-31

Carew Concrete & Supply Co., Inc. v. Town of Humboldt
, 104 Wis. 2d 137, 145, 311 N.W.2d 658 (Ct. App. 1981) (quoted source omitted). However, evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3004 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, 2010 WI App 116, ¶11, 329 Wis. 2d 240, 789 N.W.2d 351 (quoting Palsgraf v. Long Island R. Co., 162 N.E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59536 - 2011-01-31