Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13601 - 13610 of 63555 for records/1000.
Search results 13601 - 13610 of 63555 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724830 - 2023-11-07
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724830 - 2023-11-07
State v. Otis J. Martin
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion or applied the wrong legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion or applied the wrong legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
- Mejia was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166154 - 2017-09-21
- Mejia was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony. He also sought to introduce an additional phone record purporting to show that Nolen called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110588 - 2017-09-21
testimony. He also sought to introduce an additional phone record purporting to show that Nolen called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110588 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Lemieux could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Lemieux could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09
Keith A. Brown v. Classic Inns of Wisconsin, Inc.
the trial court exercised discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3939 - 2005-03-31
the trial court exercised discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3939 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty or not guilty.” Garrison affirmed on the record his understanding that by pleading guilty he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29632 - 2007-07-16
guilty or not guilty.” Garrison affirmed on the record his understanding that by pleading guilty he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29632 - 2007-07-16