Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13611 - 13620 of 68466 for did.
Search results 13611 - 13620 of 68466 for did.
Cindee Gardner v. David Gardner
been successful, the wife would have received no maintenance. See id. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12653 - 2005-03-31
been successful, the wife would have received no maintenance. See id. Here, the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12653 - 2005-03-31
State v. Isaac Hughes
answer the following question: “Did the defendant possess cocaine with intent to deliver while within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3304 - 2005-03-31
answer the following question: “Did the defendant possess cocaine with intent to deliver while within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3304 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward W. Ruzga
Ruzga maintains that Long did not have the requisite reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
Ruzga maintains that Long did not have the requisite reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
court heard the motion on April 20, 1998. Zenia C. did not appear. In her absence, her counsel argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14614 - 2005-03-31
court heard the motion on April 20, 1998. Zenia C. did not appear. In her absence, her counsel argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2012-02-01
in the loss of their dog. Society did not appear at trial, and the circuit court entered a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2012-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
with you and Investigator Dernbach, correct? A Eventually she did, yes. Q Okay. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2006-10-29
with you and Investigator Dernbach, correct? A Eventually she did, yes. Q Okay. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2006-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
findings that we’ve already provided to this court.” Therefore, the court concluded that the report did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30266 - 2007-09-17
findings that we’ve already provided to this court.” Therefore, the court concluded that the report did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30266 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: ABRAHAMSON, J. and BRADLEY, A. W., J. dissent (Opinion filed). NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J. did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170721 - 2017-09-21
: ABRAHAMSON, J. and BRADLEY, A. W., J. dissent (Opinion filed). NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J. did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170721 - 2017-09-21