Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13621 - 13630 of 30097 for de.
Search results 13621 - 13630 of 30097 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
of law that this court reviews de novo. In re Michelle A.D., 181 Wis.2d 917, 922-23, 512 N.W.2d 248, 249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. In re Michelle A.D., 181 Wis.2d 917, 922-23, 512 N.W.2d 248, 249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
State v. Ventae Parrow
to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id. Discussion Parrow’s two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id. Discussion Parrow’s two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
Walter V. Lee v. David Paulson
Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Fin. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2707 - 2005-03-31
Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Fin. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2707 - 2005-03-31
Sandra L. Wojtasiak v. Podiatry Associates
be given is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 602. However, appellate courts ordinarily defer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4301 - 2005-03-31
be given is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 602. However, appellate courts ordinarily defer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462 N.W.2d 538, 540 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462 N.W.2d 538, 540 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a claim is procedurally barred “is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Tillman, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04
a claim is procedurally barred “is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Tillman, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was properly granted by the circuit court is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schmidt, 305 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186278 - 2017-09-21
was properly granted by the circuit court is a question of law that we review de novo. See Schmidt, 305 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186278 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 180
de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26092 - 2006-09-26
de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26092 - 2006-09-26