Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13621 - 13630 of 68499 for did.
Search results 13621 - 13630 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing, the prosecutor explained that after Hicks decided that he did not want to resolve the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109537 - 2017-09-21
hearing, the prosecutor explained that after Hicks decided that he did not want to resolve the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Neil P. Jackson
kick the door, and three or four gunshots. Dejesus told the jury that she did not recognize the man
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7558 - 2017-09-19
kick the door, and three or four gunshots. Dejesus told the jury that she did not recognize the man
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7558 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott M. Sterr
was involuntary because he did not understand the elements of the offense or possible defenses due to limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6121 - 2005-03-31
was involuntary because he did not understand the elements of the offense or possible defenses due to limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6121 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
and appellate counsels did not seek to suppress Sellers’ confession, which he claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26098 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
expert testimony based on PBT results did not violate the defendant’s constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248345 - 2019-10-08
expert testimony based on PBT results did not violate the defendant’s constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248345 - 2019-10-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. but, rather lived with her. According to Iraida B., David W. did, however, “pick up Ameen on a regular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32947 - 2014-09-15
. but, rather lived with her. According to Iraida B., David W. did, however, “pick up Ameen on a regular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.23 to bring the action on the 1999 judgment because Carroll did not serve the petition on Sarko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349439 - 2021-03-25
. § 806.23 to bring the action on the 1999 judgment because Carroll did not serve the petition on Sarko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349439 - 2021-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Matthew R.L.
by while the friend stole various electronic items from a car and a trailer. Matthew did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
by while the friend stole various electronic items from a car and a trailer. Matthew did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
to be administered to Marlene at 2:40 a.m., for suspected contractions. It did not alleviate Marlene's pain. At 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37485 - 2009-07-09
to be administered to Marlene at 2:40 a.m., for suspected contractions. It did not alleviate Marlene's pain. At 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37485 - 2009-07-09
Frontsheet
) that the State did not violate Luedtke's due process rights when the Laboratory destroyed his blood sample
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140599 - 2015-04-23
) that the State did not violate Luedtke's due process rights when the Laboratory destroyed his blood sample
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140599 - 2015-04-23