Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13631 - 13640 of 38587 for t's.
Search results 13631 - 13640 of 38587 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Nkosi K. Brown
concluded that “[t]he seizure of the identification cards was not justified under the plain view doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4936 - 2017-09-19
concluded that “[t]he seizure of the identification cards was not justified under the plain view doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4936 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 193 Wis. 2d at 388-89, include: [T]he time between the end of the polygraph examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28384 - 2014-09-15
, 193 Wis. 2d at 388-89, include: [T]he time between the end of the polygraph examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
State v. Durrell M.E.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Francis T. Wasielewski, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6489 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Francis T. Wasielewski, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglass Potter
interfering with the trial court’s discretion in determining sentences, and “[t]he trial court is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
interfering with the trial court’s discretion in determining sentences, and “[t]he trial court is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances presented: “[T]he State made two separate and distinct sentencing recommendations via two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
the circumstances presented: “[T]he State made two separate and distinct sentencing recommendations via two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
2010 WI APP 35
meeting with her. According to Isaacson’s affidavit, “[t]he purpose of that meeting was to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46521 - 2011-02-07
meeting with her. According to Isaacson’s affidavit, “[t]he purpose of that meeting was to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46521 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
WI APP 176
….” Id., ¶2. A convicted defendant also has “[t]he right to counsel on direct appeal,” which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26141 - 2014-09-15
….” Id., ¶2. A convicted defendant also has “[t]he right to counsel on direct appeal,” which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Toy, 125 Wis. 2d 216, 222, 371 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). Further, “[i]t is certainly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
. Toy, 125 Wis. 2d 216, 222, 371 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). Further, “[i]t is certainly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
Wis.2d 180, 188, 332 N.W.2d 293, 298 (1983) (quoted source omitted). “[T]he legal conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14298 - 2014-09-15
Wis.2d 180, 188, 332 N.W.2d 293, 298 (1983) (quoted source omitted). “[T]he legal conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14298 - 2014-09-15