Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 49879 for our.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 49879 for our.
City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
In State v. Chambers, 55 Wis. 2d 289, 294, 198 N.W.2d 377 (1972), our Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31
In State v. Chambers, 55 Wis. 2d 289, 294, 198 N.W.2d 377 (1972), our Wisconsin Supreme Court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to Flood’s sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253236 - 2020-01-29
to a challenge to Flood’s sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253236 - 2020-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of counsel. Bianca was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142821 - 2017-09-21
of counsel. Bianca was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Darrell D. Cage v. Gary R. McCaughtry
before his hearing. However, our supreme court has declared that the standard “notice of major
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13859 - 2014-09-15
before his hearing. However, our supreme court has declared that the standard “notice of major
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13859 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of fact satisfied those principles. The suppression motion was properly denied. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107628 - 2014-02-04
of fact satisfied those principles. The suppression motion was properly denied. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107628 - 2014-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176104 - 2017-09-21
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
awarded 106 days of jail credit in Case No. 2012CF173. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181971 - 2017-09-21
awarded 106 days of jail credit in Case No. 2012CF173. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
State v. Richard Stensvad
.2d 800, 840-41, 532 N.W.2d 94, 110 (1995), our supreme court addressed the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
.2d 800, 840-41, 532 N.W.2d 94, 110 (1995), our supreme court addressed the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
damage.” The court denied the petition. Our review of the record establishes there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772727 - 2024-03-06
damage.” The court denied the petition. Our review of the record establishes there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772727 - 2024-03-06