Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 18714 for quote.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the basis for the sentence.’” Id., ¶14 (quoting Welch v. Lane, 738 F.2d 863, 866 (7th Cir. 1984
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226345 - 2018-11-01

[PDF] Darrel Alix v. Badger Mining Corporation
committed by a particular, identified person.” Id. at 298-99 n.4 (quoting Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4783 - 2017-09-19

Betty A. Hutjens v. Robert E. Hutjens
(quoting Brett R. Turner, Equitable Distribution of Property 288 (2d ed. 1994)). Importantly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4598 - 2005-03-31

Lawrence D. Ledman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
, the policy must not be rewritten by construction.’” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13567 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 8, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
the conclusion of the court below.” Id. (quoting Estate of Larsen, 7 Wis. 2d 263, 273, 96 N.W.2d 489 (1959
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29906 - 2007-08-07

COURT OF APPEALS
by ‘a statement of reasons for the selection of consecutive terms’” (quoting Hall, 255 Wis. 2d 662, ¶14 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94978 - 2013-04-03

[PDF] State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
. 1993) (quoting Conroy v. Aniskoff, 507 U.S. 511, 519 (1993) (Scalia, J. concurring)), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
as to conclude the owner.” Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶6, 247 Wis. 2d 118, 633 N.W.2d 674 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125491 - 2014-11-03

[PDF] State v. Felicia J.
based its decision,’ we will affirm that verdict.” Id., ¶39 (quoting Lundin v. Shimanski, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6389 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion, arguing that the quoted language protected U.S. Oil as well as AMBR because the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35688 - 2009-02-25