Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 84365 for simple case search/1000.

County of Iowa v. Leon T. Klinger
against unreasonable searches and seizures and suffering the sanction of lost driving privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5047 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, and we see no reason to do that in this case. Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433, 443-44, 287 N.W.2d 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56317 - 2010-11-03

COURT OF APPEALS
the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV; Wis. Const. art. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102037 - 2013-09-17

[PDF] NOTICE
for the first time on appeal, and we see no reason to do that in this case. Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56317 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Harder
from Harder pursuant to a search warrant, and Harder did not seek suppression of the blood DNA test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5405 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117628 - 2017-09-21

[MS WORD] PR-1840: Petition for Summary Assignment (Formal Administration)
Administration) Case No. I declare that: 1. The decedent, with date of birth and date
/formdisplay/PR-1840.doc?formNumber=PR-1840&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 814.29.2 A litigant is entitled to free transcripts on appeal of a civil case when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63427 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Iowa v. Leon T. Klinger
searches and seizures and suffering the sanction of lost driving privileges. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5047 - 2017-09-19

State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
second assertion. He does not address the infirmity he perceives in the State’s case. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31