Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 13641 - 13650 of 58458 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.03. Smith claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36798 - 2009-06-15
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.03. Smith claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36798 - 2009-06-15
State v. Mark L. Auger
, for a total of $197. Auger made numerous postconviction motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7123 - 2005-03-31
, for a total of $197. Auger made numerous postconviction motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Norman R.
3 ¶1 FINE, J. Norman and Doreen R. appeal from an order entered following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5322 - 2017-09-19
3 ¶1 FINE, J. Norman and Doreen R. appeal from an order entered following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5322 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
construction of six airplane hangars by the Sertiches and Metro Hangar Partners, LLC (MHP).1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65160 - 2014-09-15
construction of six airplane hangars by the Sertiches and Metro Hangar Partners, LLC (MHP).1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65160 - 2014-09-15
City of Whitewater v. Jeffrey L. Wyczawski
that the judgment should be reversed because the trial court erroneously allowed the City of Whitewater’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31
that the judgment should be reversed because the trial court erroneously allowed the City of Whitewater’s expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel was ineffective because he did not argue that Canady’s trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
counsel was ineffective because he did not argue that Canady’s trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103195 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103195 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to [Sure-Dry].” On July 20, 2006, the trial court signed the order allowing intervention and also ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32904 - 2008-08-26
to [Sure-Dry].” On July 20, 2006, the trial court signed the order allowing intervention and also ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32904 - 2008-08-26
State v. Gustavo Espino
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Gustavo Espino appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Gustavo Espino appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven R. Calhoun
of a child, contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. Calhoun also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12199 - 2005-03-31
of a child, contrary to § 948.02(2), Stats. Calhoun also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12199 - 2005-03-31