Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prepared an estimate of $29,862.80 for the replacement cost value (RCV) of the loss and $18,183.57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017336 - 2025-09-30

Northern Indiana MFabricators, Inc. v. Seville Flexpack Corporation
the costs that Seville incurred to complete the work after Northern breached the contract, insofar as those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11993 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael John Noonan
requiring him to pay Florence County $6,502.04 in costs incurred in connection with his arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21

Northern Indiana MFabricators, Inc. v. Seville Flexpack Corporation
the costs that Seville incurred to complete the work after Northern breached the contract, insofar as those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10375 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael John Noonan
appeals an order requiring him to pay Florence County $6,502.04 in costs incurred in connection with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15034 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build the billboard new; $2,500 for relocation expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115254 - 2014-06-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This “$83,525 consisted of $75,175 for the in-place value of the billboard, i.e. the cost to build
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115254 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Alfredo Vega
records of Vega's treatment the day before the homicide. Counsel also requested a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9845 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Vincent D. Whitaker
of discretion in the trial court’s determination that the prejudicial effect of the new evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9918 - 2017-09-19

State v. Vincent D. Whitaker
in the trial court’s determination that the prejudicial effect of the new evidence did not outweigh its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9918 - 2005-03-31