Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Tim G. Frauchiger
of law which we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d at 356. ¶14 We agree that the undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5681 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d at 356. ¶14 We agree that the undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5681 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Although our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to present the issue as they did. We review de novo the issue of whether a WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
to present the issue as they did. We review de novo the issue of whether a WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645724 - 2023-04-19
State v. Tonia L. Munz
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP812 Complete Title o...
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5491 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5491 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ventae Parrow
to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id. Discussion Parrow’s two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id. Discussion Parrow’s two arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31