Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Javier Salgado
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100616 - 2013-08-13
followed. ¶9 “We review the grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100616 - 2013-08-13
Shawn Krenke v. Timothy Krenke
commissioner declined to find Timothy in contempt. Shawn sought de novo review of the decision in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
commissioner declined to find Timothy in contempt. Shawn sought de novo review of the decision in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
Methodist Manor of Waukesha, Inc. v. Evelyn Martin
of Methodist Manor’s amended complaint against Frederick Martin is de novo and we must accept as true the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4526 - 2005-03-31
of Methodist Manor’s amended complaint against Frederick Martin is de novo and we must accept as true the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4526 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David R. Barnes v. The Town of Mt. Pleasant
id. Our review is de novo. See Menick, 200 Wis.2d at 742, 547 N.W.2d at 780. The complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12364 - 2017-09-21
id. Our review is de novo. See Menick, 200 Wis.2d at 742, 547 N.W.2d at 780. The complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12364 - 2017-09-21
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Lois
we review de novo. Id. Section 343.305(3)(a), STATS., provides in relevant part: [A] law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8778 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. Id. Section 343.305(3)(a), STATS., provides in relevant part: [A] law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8778 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Mente
is in custody is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18856 - 2017-09-21
is in custody is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18856 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Harris
justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9175 - 2017-09-19
justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9175 - 2017-09-19