Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13651 - 13660 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was necessary because it substantiated his claim in his § 974.06 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
was necessary because it substantiated his claim in his § 974.06 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 We do not address Simpson’s claim for sentence modification because Simpson has abandoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
).1 We do not address Simpson’s claim for sentence modification because Simpson has abandoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and this court will not discuss them further. In response to the no-merit report, Jackson claims that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218909 - 2018-09-11
, and this court will not discuss them further. In response to the no-merit report, Jackson claims that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218909 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
David Kneer v. James M. Sarkauskas
. The Kneers claim that in 1990 they were induced to purchase bonds in reliance on Sarkauskas' false written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
. The Kneers claim that in 1990 they were induced to purchase bonds in reliance on Sarkauskas' false written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Michael R. Johnson
CURIAM. Waukesha County appeals from a judgment dismissing its claims against Michael R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2624 - 2017-09-19
CURIAM. Waukesha County appeals from a judgment dismissing its claims against Michael R. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2624 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
] Matamoros argues that the postconviction court erred when it concluded that the claims asserted in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
] Matamoros argues that the postconviction court erred when it concluded that the claims asserted in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary Kathleen Arthur
. impleaded David Roeming as a third-party defendant, claiming it purchased the gaskets from him. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
. impleaded David Roeming as a third-party defendant, claiming it purchased the gaskets from him. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
making payments less than one year after the Note was executed. Stonebridge filed a small claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
making payments less than one year after the Note was executed. Stonebridge filed a small claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
with Sharon. The judgment also provided that Sharon was to claim Tony as a tax exemption and James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
with Sharon. The judgment also provided that Sharon was to claim Tony as a tax exemption and James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied motions to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21
denied motions to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117397 - 2014-07-21