Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 60809 for affidavit of service form.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 60809 for affidavit of service form.
CA Blank Order
. The court in Hopgood observed that the affidavits submitted by the notaries who had met with the claimants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93049 - 2013-02-14
. The court in Hopgood observed that the affidavits submitted by the notaries who had met with the claimants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93049 - 2013-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the property to Olson under these circumstances. Olson complains that Donovan did not file an affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141254 - 2017-09-21
the property to Olson under these circumstances. Olson complains that Donovan did not file an affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul J. Koch
alcohol concentration. The affidavit in support of the criminal complaint stated: D. WOERPEL, your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13237 - 2017-09-21
alcohol concentration. The affidavit in support of the criminal complaint stated: D. WOERPEL, your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Trisha M. Liethen v. Stephen W. Allen
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leo Dunlap v. City of Kenosha
for use of pedestrians.” ¶8 In its summary judgment materials, the City offered the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19871 - 2017-09-21
for use of pedestrians.” ¶8 In its summary judgment materials, the City offered the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19871 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seeking a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. He attached an affidavit from Joshua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981681 - 2025-07-16
seeking a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. He attached an affidavit from Joshua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981681 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
were dismissed when neither Maize nor his counsel appeared or filed affidavits in opposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15
were dismissed when neither Maize nor his counsel appeared or filed affidavits in opposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26877 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on a July 20, 2010 affidavit provided by Clark is improper as it postdates the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
on a July 20, 2010 affidavit provided by Clark is improper as it postdates the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
Donald Lindquist v. Deborah Lindquist
as an “income assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11419 - 2017-09-19
as an “income assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11419 - 2017-09-19