Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the State to pursue an extradition warrant for Perkins and to keep the court and defense counsel informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78477 - 2012-02-21
the State to pursue an extradition warrant for Perkins and to keep the court and defense counsel informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78477 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) she was sentenced on inaccurate information; and (3) a new factor warrants sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
; (2) she was sentenced on inaccurate information; and (3) a new factor warrants sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Bobby P.
of a criminal complaint or in an affidavit supporting a search warrant apply to determining the factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8647 - 2017-09-19
of a criminal complaint or in an affidavit supporting a search warrant apply to determining the factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8647 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify. The court ordered the State to pursue an extradition warrant for Perkins and to keep the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78477 - 2014-09-15
to testify. The court ordered the State to pursue an extradition warrant for Perkins and to keep the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78477 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. The circuit court determined that the defense had not made a sufficient showing to warrant an in camera review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117783 - 2014-07-22
. The circuit court determined that the defense had not made a sufficient showing to warrant an in camera review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117783 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, if any, does not warrant reversal. ¶20 J.D.J. contends that the trial court erred when, over his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
, if any, does not warrant reversal. ¶20 J.D.J. contends that the trial court erred when, over his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625636 - 2023-02-22
Wisconsin Court System - Case of the month archive
consent for purposes of the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. SC opinion
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/archive.htm - 2026-03-22
consent for purposes of the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. SC opinion
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/archive.htm - 2026-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
warrants an evidentiary hearing. Similarly, we conclude that the claim that the State withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
warrants an evidentiary hearing. Similarly, we conclude that the claim that the State withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
. He presented three reasons for why a new trial was warranted: (1) DNA analysis excluded Armstrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4499 - 2017-09-19
. He presented three reasons for why a new trial was warranted: (1) DNA analysis excluded Armstrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4499 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of damages. ¶6 Turner and Freedom filed motions after verdict. They argued a new trial was warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232744 - 2019-01-15
of damages. ¶6 Turner and Freedom filed motions after verdict. They argued a new trial was warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232744 - 2019-01-15