Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 69109 for he.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 69109 for he.
State v. Christopher A. Kaczynski
of robbery, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He asserts two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4791 - 2005-03-31
of robbery, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He asserts two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4791 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Granville Rodgers v. City of Milwaukee
/Annuity and Pension Board. He argues No. 98-2668 2 that the court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14508 - 2017-09-21
/Annuity and Pension Board. He argues No. 98-2668 2 that the court erred in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Bennett, Jr.
and, when he refused, she called the police. ¶3 According to the police officers who testified, Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4080 - 2017-09-20
and, when he refused, she called the police. ¶3 According to the police officers who testified, Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4080 - 2017-09-20
Clark County v. Michael C. Collins
. § 23.33.[2] He argues that the circuit court erred in denying him a jury trial. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7542 - 2005-03-31
. § 23.33.[2] He argues that the circuit court erred in denying him a jury trial. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Washington and “discharged a firearm directly at his head.” The complaint stated: “Washington says he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194500 - 2017-09-21
Washington and “discharged a firearm directly at his head.” The complaint stated: “Washington says he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that many of Green’s arguments are not properly before us because he did not timely appeal from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36194 - 2014-09-15
that many of Green’s arguments are not properly before us because he did not timely appeal from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36194 - 2014-09-15
State v. Aaron N.
court. He argues (1) the court violated his right to due process because it discouraged him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6670 - 2005-03-31
court. He argues (1) the court violated his right to due process because it discouraged him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6670 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have the same father. No. 2019AP2180-CR 3 ¶5 Postconviction, Griffis argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01
have the same father. No. 2019AP2180-CR 3 ¶5 Postconviction, Griffis argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47043 - 2014-09-15
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47043 - 2014-09-15