Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He claims: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He claims: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
raise on appeal. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
raise on appeal. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213416 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court erroneously failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117397 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss Hilger’s two tort claims until after the close of evidence; and (3) the court erroneously failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117397 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ adverse possession claim.[2] We agree with the Niedzwieckis that § 706.09 barred the adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
’ adverse possession claim.[2] We agree with the Niedzwieckis that § 706.09 barred the adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
claims: (1) he was abandoned by his postconviction counsel; (2) he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
claims: (1) he was abandoned by his postconviction counsel; (2) he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in favor of the City of Brookfield. They claim that the City violated WIS. STAT. § 703.27(2) (2007-08)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59191 - 2014-09-15
in favor of the City of Brookfield. They claim that the City violated WIS. STAT. § 703.27(2) (2007-08)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59191 - 2014-09-15
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
with Sharon. The judgment also provided that Sharon was to claim Tony as a tax exemption and James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
with Sharon. The judgment also provided that Sharon was to claim Tony as a tax exemption and James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
renamed the business Longshot Saloon. Weichman thereafter brought a small claims action against Ghoelke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28160 - 2007-02-20
renamed the business Longshot Saloon. Weichman thereafter brought a small claims action against Ghoelke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28160 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
a small claims action against Ghoelke and others, asserting that the sale of assets did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28160 - 2014-09-15
a small claims action against Ghoelke and others, asserting that the sale of assets did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28160 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
possession claim. 2 We agree with the Niedzwieckis that § 706.09 barred the adverse possession claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143483 - 2017-09-21
possession claim. 2 We agree with the Niedzwieckis that § 706.09 barred the adverse possession claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143483 - 2017-09-21