Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 13661 - 13670 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gordon R. Anderson, Jr.
to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, STATS.1 He contends the trial court made two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14928 - 2017-09-21
to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, STATS.1 He contends the trial court made two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the discovery of “newly discovered evidence” that had it been known at the time of trial would have resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21
of the discovery of “newly discovered evidence” that had it been known at the time of trial would have resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 27
) (2003-04).1 He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
) (2003-04).1 He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 27
. § 125.075(1) (2003-04).[1] He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict him of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
. § 125.075(1) (2003-04).[1] He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict him of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial.1 The postconviction motion is based on purported newly discovered evidence which he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271059 - 2020-07-21
trial.1 The postconviction motion is based on purported newly discovered evidence which he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271059 - 2020-07-21
Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2005-03-31
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the probationary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the probationary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
96-CV-1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21