Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13671 - 13680 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13671 - 13680 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
State v. Tonia L. Munz
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11464 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Giffin v. Gary Poetzl
of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Goldblatt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Goldblatt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
Ericka Clark v. Devin R. Mudge, M.D.
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
established a de facto policy in the District.” ¶18 This argument implicitly assumes that the arbitrator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31685 - 2014-09-15
established a de facto policy in the District.” ¶18 This argument implicitly assumes that the arbitrator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31685 - 2014-09-15
WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP812 Complete Title o...
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
N.W.2d 222 (1978). We do not assess the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2780 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 222 (1978). We do not assess the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2780 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5491 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5491 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joshua Jenkins
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31