Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13671 - 13680 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13671 - 13680 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
presents a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which may be necessary to determine the correct legal standard, are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894731 - 2024-12-26
interpretation, which may be necessary to determine the correct legal standard, are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894731 - 2024-12-26
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of misrepresentation is a question of law we review de novo. Loula v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 175 Wis. 2d 50, 54, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16
of misrepresentation is a question of law we review de novo. Loula v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 175 Wis. 2d 50, 54, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
State v. Victor M. Kennedy
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11216 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11216 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marcus M.
reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15694 - 2005-03-31
reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15694 - 2005-03-31