Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
authority such as this raises an issue of law that we review de novo. R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 862, 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131840 - 2014-12-22
authority such as this raises an issue of law that we review de novo. R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 862, 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131840 - 2014-12-22
State v. Daniel R. Nehring
which we review de novo. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3807 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
[PDF]
Thomas Konkel v. Town of Elba Town Board
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10913 - 2017-09-20
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10913 - 2017-09-20
State v. Andrew K. Green
, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15824 - 2005-03-31
, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 124
. Standard of Review. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo. Nell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101938 - 2017-09-21
. Standard of Review. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo. Nell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101938 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Rutter v. Copper, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Rutter v. Copper, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing factor is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258606 - 2020-04-28
sentencing factor is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶36. However, the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258606 - 2020-04-28
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31