Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 63891 for records/1000.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 63891 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
will reverse an exercise of discretion only if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5243 - 2017-09-19
will reverse an exercise of discretion only if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5243 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Darnell Stevens
filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136865 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136865 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203728 - 2017-11-28
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203728 - 2017-11-28
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113227 - 2014-06-03
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113227 - 2014-06-03
Patricia Luchsinger v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
deposition that she would "have to go back and look at her records" to substantiate her wage loss claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10306 - 2005-03-31
deposition that she would "have to go back and look at her records" to substantiate her wage loss claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10306 - 2005-03-31