Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 58445 for speedy trial.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 58445 for speedy trial.
2007 WI APP 27
. § 125.075(1) (2003-04).[1] He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict him of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
. § 125.075(1) (2003-04).[1] He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict him of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
State v. Gordon R. Anderson, Jr.
to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, Stats.[1] He contends the trial court made two evidentiary errors: it admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14928 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, Stats.[1] He contends the trial court made two evidentiary errors: it admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial.1 The postconviction motion is based on purported newly discovered evidence which he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271059 - 2020-07-21
trial.1 The postconviction motion is based on purported newly discovered evidence which he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271059 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
WI APP 27
) (2003-04).1 He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
) (2003-04).1 He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the discovery of “newly discovered evidence” that had it been known at the time of trial would have resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21
of the discovery of “newly discovered evidence” that had it been known at the time of trial would have resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gordon R. Anderson, Jr.
to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, STATS.1 He contends the trial court made two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14928 - 2017-09-21
to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 939.05, STATS.1 He contends the trial court made two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Sakajust K. Scott appeals from a trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Sakajust K. Scott appeals from a trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
Family Services of Barron County, Inc. v. Paul W.
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Adrienne Seider
PER CURIAM. Alan D. Eisenberg appeals from the trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5217 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Alan D. Eisenberg appeals from the trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5217 - 2005-03-31