Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 13681 - 13690 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Michael Collins v. Sol Detente
. ANDERSON, J. Sol and Bonnie Detente request reexamination of the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14096 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, J. Sol and Bonnie Detente request reexamination of the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14096 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
Law, contrary to § 19.97, STATS.1 Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
Law, contrary to § 19.97, STATS.1 Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel, that evidence of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel, that evidence of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was before the Honorable Gwen Connolly. We refer to them both as the trial court. 3 V.R.’s older
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326727 - 2021-01-26
was before the Honorable Gwen Connolly. We refer to them both as the trial court. 3 V.R.’s older
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326727 - 2021-01-26
Family Services of Barron County, Inc. v. Paul W.
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
Susan A. Wiseman v. Kevin R. Wiseman
CURIAM. Kevin and Susan Wiseman were divorced on December 18, 2002.[1] Among other things, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6493 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Kevin and Susan Wiseman were divorced on December 18, 2002.[1] Among other things, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and also hold that Weichman’s appeal is frivolous. We remand to the trial court for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
and also hold that Weichman’s appeal is frivolous. We remand to the trial court for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
. We remand to the trial court for a determination of Barber’s costs and fees, including reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28331 - 2007-03-06
. We remand to the trial court for a determination of Barber’s costs and fees, including reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28331 - 2007-03-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,3 there was no documentary or other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,3 there was no documentary or other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15