Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13691 - 13700 of 64982 for b's.
Search results 13691 - 13700 of 64982 for b's.
State v. Jonathon R.
was substantial and unreasonable. The State counters that “[b]y making his own home-made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12518 - 2005-03-31
was substantial and unreasonable. The State counters that “[b]y making his own home-made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12518 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
: Court: Circuit County: Milwaukee Judge: Marshall B. Murray Justices: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104088 - 2013-11-10
: Court: Circuit County: Milwaukee Judge: Marshall B. Murray Justices: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104088 - 2013-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 4 First-degree reckless homicide is a Class B felony, which has a maximum penalty of sixty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721832 - 2023-11-01
. 4 First-degree reckless homicide is a Class B felony, which has a maximum penalty of sixty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721832 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief, see WIS. STAT. § 801.02(7)(b), and that his request to vacate his Milwaukee County conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
relief, see WIS. STAT. § 801.02(7)(b), and that his request to vacate his Milwaukee County conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ERIK B. HUDSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53128 - 2014-09-15
. ERIK B. HUDSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53128 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paul B. Mey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37751 - 2009-07-15
IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paul B. Mey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37751 - 2009-07-15
[PDF]
Dennis Brooks v. Diane Hietpas
. (1). (b) The testator’s implicit or explicit acknowledgement of the testator’s signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21302 - 2017-09-21
. (1). (b) The testator’s implicit or explicit acknowledgement of the testator’s signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sheila L. Davis v. Carey K. Davis
lacks an appropriate offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.(1)(b). The record fails to illuminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
lacks an appropriate offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.(1)(b). The record fails to illuminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)1 (2003-04), defendants may petition for sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28884 - 2007-06-26
, Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)1 (2003-04), defendants may petition for sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28884 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
: And further, invoking the provisions of sec. 939.62(1) (b) Wis. Stats., because the defendant is a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57881 - 2014-09-15
: And further, invoking the provisions of sec. 939.62(1) (b) Wis. Stats., because the defendant is a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57881 - 2014-09-15