Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13691 - 13700 of 30098 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13691 - 13700 of 30098 for consulta de causas.
State v. Eugene E. Volk
facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion alleges sufficient facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Booker, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194534 - 2017-09-21
the motion alleges sufficient facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Booker, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194534 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daryl O. Norris
de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656 (1976). This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5675 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656 (1976). This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. David A. Prusinski
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11586 - 2017-09-19
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11586 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
of law we review de novo. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22 at ¶12. ¶5 In some circumstances, information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22 at ¶12. ¶5 In some circumstances, information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
Kohler Company v. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dorothy McGrane v. John O'Brien
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24800 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous. State v. Young, 2006 WI 98, ¶17, 294 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 729. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721268 - 2023-10-31
erroneous. State v. Young, 2006 WI 98, ¶17, 294 Wis. 2d 1, 717 N.W.2d 729. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721268 - 2023-10-31