Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1371 - 1380 of 82690 for case code.

Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
over some matters. Here, the Wisconsin Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27

[PDF] Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department may discipline inmates in its legal custody,” so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21

Donald Wollheim v. University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc.
, as required by Wis. Stat. § 36.15(3) (2003-04)[1] and administrative code provisions promulgated pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19405 - 2005-08-24

[PDF] Sharon M. Blomdahl v. Corey C. Blomdahl
of this case to the language of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § [DWD] 40.04(25).” Corey contends, “[I]t is precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6507 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Admin. Code § DHS 10.44 (through July 2015), the “Standards for performance by CMOs” as well as what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144509 - 2015-07-19

Sharon M. Blomdahl v. Corey C. Blomdahl
a demonstrated reasoning process, to apply the undisputed facts of this case to the language of Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Assessment ¶11 Pointing to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DHS 10.44 (through July 2015), the “Standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144509 - 2017-09-21

William Harris v. Gary R. McCaughtry
satisfied the administrative code or due process, but whether it complied with the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21407 - 2006-02-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Avenue, Beloit. The circuit court concluded that the code violations cited by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110827 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the code violations cited by the City and the assessed value of the property were pretextual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110827 - 2014-04-23