Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1371 - 1380 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 1371 - 1380 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Pam Olson’s farm. The Olsons are the record titleholders to the disputed parcel; the Thorns claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34127 - 2008-09-24
and Pam Olson’s farm. The Olsons are the record titleholders to the disputed parcel; the Thorns claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34127 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the disputed parcel; the No. 2006AP2063 2 Thorns claim ownership of the parcel by adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34127 - 2014-09-15
to the disputed parcel; the No. 2006AP2063 2 Thorns claim ownership of the parcel by adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC v. Frauchigers, LLC
with directions. ¶1 CURLEY, J.1 LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC (LDC) appeals the dismissal of its small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19238 - 2017-09-21
with directions. ¶1 CURLEY, J.1 LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC (LDC) appeals the dismissal of its small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19238 - 2017-09-21
LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC v. Frauchigers, LLC
. ¶1 CURLEY, J.[1] LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC (LDC) appeals the dismissal of its small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19238 - 2005-08-08
. ¶1 CURLEY, J.[1] LDC-728 Milwaukee, LLC (LDC) appeals the dismissal of its small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19238 - 2005-08-08
Carla S. v. Frank B.
and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 In 1991, Carl and his wife, Genevieve, deeded their home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 In 1991, Carl and his wife, Genevieve, deeded their home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carla S. v. Frank B.
therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 In 1991, Carl and his wife, Genevieve, deeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16214 - 2017-09-21
therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 In 1991, Carl and his wife, Genevieve, deeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of eviction, denied Gartner’s claim for damages, and awarded damages to HBP. Gartner argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313011 - 2020-12-15
of eviction, denied Gartner’s claim for damages, and awarded damages to HBP. Gartner argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313011 - 2020-12-15
CA Blank Order
time having passed in this matter—as to what its original intent was, and quite honestly, based on what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134534 - 2015-02-02
time having passed in this matter—as to what its original intent was, and quite honestly, based on what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134534 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
September 16, 2010
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54435 - 2014-09-15
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54435 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 3, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
, that it is liable for actual or punitive damages, the Barkers are not entitled to summary judgment on these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32319 - 2008-04-02
, that it is liable for actual or punitive damages, the Barkers are not entitled to summary judgment on these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32319 - 2008-04-02