Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(including the effective date of removal).” Subsections XI.A. and XI.B. of the trust reserved to Robin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575399 - 2022-10-11
(including the effective date of removal).” Subsections XI.A. and XI.B. of the trust reserved to Robin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575399 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
Methodist Manor of Waukesha, Inc. v. Evelyn Martin
promulgated by the department, toward the cost of care in the facility.1 Additionally, Evelyn Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4526 - 2017-09-19
promulgated by the department, toward the cost of care in the facility.1 Additionally, Evelyn Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a 35% developer adjustment to account for the time, cost, and expense necessary to develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
a 35% developer adjustment to account for the time, cost, and expense necessary to develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
Carolyn A. Benson v. City of Ashland
and costs incurred prior to the trial; (4) ruled that the jury array was proper; and (5) failed to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
and costs incurred prior to the trial; (4) ruled that the jury array was proper; and (5) failed to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, minus a 35% developer adjustment to account for the time, cost, and expense necessary to develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
, minus a 35% developer adjustment to account for the time, cost, and expense necessary to develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
WI 101
, the OLR does not seek costs. Costs of this proceeding will not be imposed. ¶17 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33455 - 2014-09-15
, the OLR does not seek costs. Costs of this proceeding will not be imposed. ¶17 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
in the amount of $1391.11 plus costs in favor of Pagels at the conclusion of the November 15, 2002 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
in the amount of $1391.11 plus costs in favor of Pagels at the conclusion of the November 15, 2002 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
, they contended, the McGees are subject to a limit on the cost of additions or modifications of fifty percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
, they contended, the McGees are subject to a limit on the cost of additions or modifications of fifty percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28
court to explain how it addressed the cost of materials paid by the Derricks when it calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28