Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jerry L. Parker
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4479 - 2005-03-31
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. Limits placed on a defendant’s movement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
rights de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. Limits placed on a defendant’s movement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
David R. Barnes v. The Town of Mt. Pleasant
). If so, the inquiry shifts to whether any factual issues exist. See id. Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12364 - 2005-03-31
). If so, the inquiry shifts to whether any factual issues exist. See id. Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
Joseph Sorrel v. Livesey Company LLC
¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25035 - 2017-09-21
¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25035 - 2017-09-21
Steven R. Passehl v. Jay Zeinert
unless otherwise noted. [2] Zeinert contends that this issue is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7603 - 2005-03-31
unless otherwise noted. [2] Zeinert contends that this issue is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7603 - 2005-03-31
Timothy G. Whiteagle v. Anne E.W. Johnson
threshold for maintaining an action under Wis. Stat. § 806.07. We review summary judgments de novo using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7607 - 2005-03-31
threshold for maintaining an action under Wis. Stat. § 806.07. We review summary judgments de novo using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7607 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an incorrect reconsideration standard. ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159458 - 2017-09-21
an incorrect reconsideration standard. ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159458 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31