Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
potential bargain between the State and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
potential bargain between the State and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
96-CV-1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
State v. David E. Williams
assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
collectively satisfied the statute of frauds, § 706.02(1), Stats. The trial court disagreed and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
collectively satisfied the statute of frauds, § 706.02(1), Stats. The trial court disagreed and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene A. Pagois
. On appeal, Pagois seeks to have his conviction vacated and remanded for a new trial. Pagois argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19
. On appeal, Pagois seeks to have his conviction vacated and remanded for a new trial. Pagois argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel, that evidence of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9493 - 2017-09-19
argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel, that evidence of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9493 - 2017-09-19
Family Services of Barron County, Inc. v. Paul W.
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argued his trial counsel was ineffective based on a conflict of interest.[2] He also argued his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104566 - 2013-11-18
. He argued his trial counsel was ineffective based on a conflict of interest.[2] He also argued his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104566 - 2013-11-18