Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13711 - 13720 of 50102 for our.

State v. John R. Martin
. Kachinsky concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11307 - 2013-12-09

CA Blank Order
disciplinary action. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142575 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
damage.” The court denied the petition. Our review of the record establishes there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772727 - 2024-03-06

State v. Kenneth L. Dade
hearing is never the subject of court action. Dade posits that this scheme, therefore, is unlike ours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15896 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) Gressel has grounds to modify his sentences to have them run concurrent instead of consecutive. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.2d 906. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form, jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279094 - 2020-08-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the McNeely 2 rule; and (3) the lack of qualified personnel to perform an AODA assessment. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142791 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
relating to the false imprisonment charge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122819 - 2014-09-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
awarded 106 days of jail credit in Case No. 2012CF173. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181971 - 2017-09-21